#EpicFail: government botches communication on Gupta plane

South Africa
Guests arrive the Waterkloof Airforce Base terminal for the Gupta family wedding. Courtesy Barry Bateman/Eyewitness News Picture: Courtesy Barry Bateman/Eyewitness News

After a day of denials, contradictions and confusion, two government departments now appear to be at war over the Gupta Wedding Plane.

At issue, whether the plane actually had official permission to land at Waterkloof Air Force Base.

The plane was carrying over 200 wedding guests, arriving for the week-long Gupta wedding extravaganza at Sun City.

The Gupta family maintains everything was above board, that the Indian High Commission had sought and been granted the relevant permission to land a civilian charter jet at the national key point.

When confirmation was sought from the Department of Defense, its head of communications officially denied that.

But hours after the DoD spokesperson gave his live interview, the Department of International Relations sent eNCA an official government statement, that suggested a stunning backtrack.

What happened next could probably be described as farcical.  

Here's the timeline of an epic commucations bungle

10:09 Department of Defense spokesperson, Siphiwe Dlamini appears live on eNCA, denying permission was granted for the Gupta wedding plane to land at Waterkloof.

17:05 International Relations releases a statement to eNCA, saying permission was indeed granted for the plane to land

19:37 Department of Defense says it had nothing to do with the statement, in spite of the fact that its Communications Head was listed as the contact person
A Department of Defense official sent a text message to our reporter saying "...the Department of Defense as well as the ministry of defense distances ourselves from a statement issued supposedly under the name of the Head of Communications in the department saying permission had been granted for an aircraft to land at Waterkloof airforce base. We wish to unequivocally reject this. Whoever gave such permission must take responsibility and own up to that..." 

19:38 International relations responds via text message, saying "They granted approval. That's a fact."

Perhaps this gives some insight into the inner workings of government, but what it doesn't do, is clarify the very important questions: was the Gupta wedding plane cleared for landing or not? If so, by whom? And if there was not official permission, then why was the plane afforded space on the apron, and a special customs detail, as well a blue light convoy to escort the wedding party out of the base?

-eNCA

COMMENTS

     

LATEST STORIES

Thousands of seasonal workers in De Doorns face a winter without jobs, as the layoff of workers for this off-season is worse than in the past.
The Oscar Pistorius trial sees Roger Dixon testifying on socks he hasn't touched, gun tests done in his absence and bullet wound findings made from a post mortem he never attended.
Britain's unemployment rate dropped to a five-year low point of 6.9% in the quarter to February, as the country's economic recovery increases before next year's general election.

TOP STORIES view all

As a robotic submarine dove into the ocean to look for lost Flight 370, Chinese relatives stormed out of a teleconference meeting to protest the Malaysian governments response.
Vote No! campaigners have approached Numsa with a view to joining forces with the union that hinted it may form a political party if it's expelled from Cosatu.
The Independent Electoral Commission won't be drawn into the debacle involving its chairperson Pansy Tlakula.

NEWS STREAMcloseview all

This is the overlay

eNCA Subscriptions

Close